Engaging Communism for Its Evil ☭
Do you remember how politicians around the world told their constituents that it was those not vaccinated against COVID-19, including those who had natural immunity to it due to previous exposure, who were at the greater risk of hospitalization and death?
Check out this health-statistics-exposing tweet from a computational biologist:
Communist politicians want total control of their populations. Communists know that lying works. That’s why they keep doing it.
Karl Marx alleged in The Communist Manifesto that there was a class struggle between owners of the means of production, whom Marx saw as the oppressors, and the workers, whom Marx saw as the oppressed.
We can call this traditional Marxism.
BLM alleges that there is a race struggle between people who are not black, whom BLM sees as the oppressors, and blacks, whom BLM sees as the oppressed.
We can call this racial Marxism.
Now we have this tweet about an article in The Atlantic by Juliette Kayyem, a former assistant secretary for homeland security under President Barack Obama:
The Atlantic originally titled it “Unvaccinated People Belong on the No-Fly List” but retitled it to “Unvaccinated People Need to Bear the Burden” instead.
No matter the article’s title, Kayyem implies that there is a vaccination struggle between airline passengers who are not vaccinated for COVID-19, whom she sees as the oppressors, and airline passengers who are vaccinated for COVID-19, whom she sees as the oppressed.
We should call this medical Marxism.
… Gene-editing technology will allow us to redesign whole organisms. This could enhance every aspect of our existence…. We’re talking about improving biology and redesigning organisms for beneficial purposes. It’s going to allow us to not just edit genomes but also[,] and importantly, write a new code for life. We’ll have write-level permissions. … Technology will cut out unwanted sights and sounds. What’s on the horizon are diminished[-]reality glasses that look very much like what I’m wearing [and] that would allow you to remove things from your view, whether that’s garbage or other people. …
https://twitter.com/wef/status/1422150187749883905
…tweeted the World Economic Forum some 90 years after a group of socialists in Germany–the National Socialists–began to promote Friedrich Nietsche’s concept of the Übermensch, which gave them moral permission to remove “other people” from view as garbage.
We know how that turned out.
As Mark Levin notes in his book American Marxism, the Wiley Online Library describes Marxist feminism in this way:
Marxist feminism is a species of feminist theory and politics that takes its theoretical bearings from Marxism, notably the criticism of capitalism as a set of structures, practices, institutions, incentives, and sensibilities that promote the exploitation of labor, the alienation of human beings, and the debasement of freedom. For Marxist feminists, empowerment and equality for women cannot be achieved within the framework of capitalism. Marxist feminism is reluctant to treat “women” as a stand-alone group [emphasis added] with similar interests and aspirations. Marxist feminism thus distinguishes itself from other modes of feminist thought and politics by attending critically and systematically to the economic organization of societies, including stratification along the lines of class; by refusing to accord the category of “women” separate and special status [emphasis added], without regard to class; by its commitment to the overthrow of capitalism; and by its allegiance to working-class and impoverished women.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0653
Thus, the American Medical Association supports Marxist feminism, per this tweet from WebMD on 30 July 2021:
Anne Appelbaum wrote about kulaks in her book about Joseph Stalin’s war on Ukraine. The first sentence in her quotation of a memoir about the Russian Revolution says it all:
What Dolot had witnessed was the beginning of “dekulakization”–the ugly, bureaucratic term that was shorthand for the “elimination of the kulaks as a class.” But who was a kulak? As noted, this term was not traditional everywhere in the USSR, and certainly not in Ukraine. Although widely used in newspapers, by agitators and by authorities of all kinds since the fall of Tsar Nicholas II, it had always been vague and ill-defined. In her memoir of the Russian Revolution, Ekaterina Olitskaia noted that in the civil[-]war era:
Anyone who expressed discontent was a kulak.
Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine, p 123
Americans not vaccinated for COVID-19 are the USA’s kulaks to Vox correspondent Ian Millhiser:
Who will decide what Millhiser means by “legitimate” as a religious or medical reason to be unvaccinated? Appelbaum’s book covers a similar question vis-à-vis kulaks:
As the state demands to “eliminate the kulaks as a class” became a priority, Ukrainian authorities felt the need to find a better definition. In August 1929 the Ukrainian Council of People’s Commissars issued a decree identifying the “symptoms” of kulak farms….
Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine, p 123
U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi does not follow HER own mandate for masks, which are ineffective and dangerous?
Huh!
The Soviet Union’s leaders did not follow THEIR own rules, either.