World Economic Forum’s tweet sounds like National Socialists 2.0.

… Gene-editing technology will allow us to redesign whole organisms. This could enhance every aspect of our existence…. We’re talking about improving biology and redesigning organisms for beneficial purposes. It’s going to allow us to not just edit genomes but also[,] and importantly, write a new code for life. We’ll have write-level permissions. … Technology will cut out unwanted sights and sounds. What’s on the horizon are diminished[-]reality glasses that look very much like what I’m wearing [and] that would allow you to remove things from your view, whether that’s garbage or other people. …

https://twitter.com/wef/status/1422150187749883905

…tweeted the World Economic Forum some 90 years after a group of socialists in Germany–the National Socialists–began to promote Friedrich Nietsche’s concept of the Übermensch, which gave them moral permission to remove “other people” from view as garbage.

We know how that turned out.

American Medical Association supports Marxist feminism.

As Mark Levin notes in his book American Marxism, the Wiley Online Library describes Marxist feminism in this way:

Marxist feminism is a species of feminist theory and politics that takes its theoretical bearings from Marxism, notably the criticism of capitalism as a set of structures, practices, institutions, incentives, and sensibilities that promote the exploitation of labor, the alienation of human beings, and the debasement of freedom. For Marxist feminists, empowerment and equality for women cannot be achieved within the framework of capitalism. Marxist feminism is reluctant to treat “women” as a stand-alone group [emphasis added] with similar interests and aspirations. Marxist feminism thus distinguishes itself from other modes of feminist thought and politics by attending critically and systematically to the economic organization of societies, including stratification along the lines of class; by refusing to accord the category of “women” separate and special status [emphasis added], without regard to class; by its commitment to the overthrow of capitalism; and by its allegiance to working-class and impoverished women.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0653

Thus, the American Medical Association supports Marxist feminism, per this tweet from WebMD on 30 July 2021:

Americans not vaccinated for COVID-19 are the USA’s kulaks to Vox correspondent Ian Millhiser.

Anne Appelbaum wrote about kulaks in her book about Joseph Stalin’s war on Ukraine. The first sentence in her quotation of a memoir about the Russian Revolution says it all:

What Dolot had witnessed was the beginning of “dekulakization”–the ugly, bureaucratic term that was shorthand for the “elimination of the kulaks as a class.” But who was a kulak? As noted, this term was not traditional everywhere in the USSR, and certainly not in Ukraine. Although widely used in newspapers, by agitators and by authorities of all kinds since the fall of Tsar Nicholas II, it had always been vague and ill-defined. In her memoir of the Russian Revolution, Ekaterina Olitskaia noted that in the civil[-]war era:

Anyone who expressed discontent was a kulak.

Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine, p 123

Americans not vaccinated for COVID-19 are the USA’s kulaks to Vox correspondent Ian Millhiser:

https://twitter.com/imillhiser/status/1420792679315742726

Who will decide what Millhiser means by “legitimate” as a religious or medical reason to be unvaccinated? Appelbaum’s book covers a similar question vis-à-vis kulaks:

As the state demands to “eliminate the kulaks as a class” became a priority, Ukrainian authorities felt the need to find a better definition. In August 1929 the Ukrainian Council of People’s Commissars issued a decree identifying the “symptoms” of kulak farms….

Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine, p 123

The Soviet Union’s leaders did not follow THEIR own rules, either.

U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi does not follow HER own mandate for masks, which are ineffective and dangerous?

Huh!

The Soviet Union’s leaders did not follow THEIR own rules, either.

Vladimir Lenin, meet Harsha Walia and Naomi Sayers.

Vladimir Lenin knew that Christianity weakened his brand of Communism.

The one institution that continued to resist Lenin’s will was the Orthodox Church. Christianity and Lenin’s brand of Communism were bound to collide, eventually. Lenin had always intended to campaign against religion and, if he could, destroy the Church, but he bided his time.

Lenin: The Man, the Dictator, and the Master of Terror, p 472

Fast forward to 2021.

Vladimir Lenin, meet Harsha Walia, executive director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, and Naomi Sayers, too: